His private resources and community influence made it more likely he would get elected and stay in office than the typical everyman that is represented in the population and does not have such resources. Kuhner also used Donald Trump to argue that the US political system is becoming less democratic and “politically equitable”, and he states “only such a financially extraordinary figure as Trump could bring to the presidency countless conflicts of interest, a family business dynasty eager to leverage its newfound political power, and an inner circle of millionaire and billionaire advisors” (479). Kruhner also demonstrated further political inequity with how millionaire candidates like Trump can utilize their practically endless resources and influence to inoculate their campaigns (478). How can an everyman complete in such a campaign and have a chance at election? More than likely he cannot. Also, I learned that in the Supreme Court decision McCutcheon v. FEC “the Watergate- era limit on the total amount of money each individual donor could give to political campaigns” was struck down further increasing the political inequality in America for candidates. I do agree that we have a “defacto plutocracy masquerading as a democracy”.
******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW TO GET THE ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION*******."
